Annual
Report
on
Curriculum,
Instruction,
and
Student
Achievement
2006-2007
#378
The
purpose of the Dawson-Boyd Visions Team is to create an environment that centers
on the learner and promotes lifelong learning in order to enhance achievement.
To accomplish this, we will create, plan, organize, support, and
facilitate a school improvement plan. We
will access, prioritize and focus, plan, facilitate/implement, and evaluate
staff development inservice for classroom teachers.
We will communicate our efforts to the students, staff, parents, and
community.
This report was prepared by Keri Bergeson, High
School Principal
and Val Tuff, Elementary Principal, for the purpose
of informing the public.
Advisory
Committee Members - Visions Team
The “Visions” Team, (a
group of students, parents, community members, teachers, and administrators) has
been charged with the responsibility of planning and implementing the staff
development activities, which will increase student performance within this
results-oriented education. Its
mission statement states:
The purpose of the Dawson-Boyd
Visions Team is to create an environment that centers on the learner and
promotes lifelong learning in order to enhance achievement.
To accomplish this, we will create, plan, organize, support, and
facilitate a school improvement plan. We
will access, prioritize and focus, plan, facilitate/implement, and evaluate
staff development inservice for classroom teachers.
We will communicate our efforts to the students, staff, parents and
community.
Advisory
Committee Members - Visions Team
Community Members
New members each year, 2 year term.
Student Members
New Jr.class member each year, 2 year term
School Board Member
Appointed by the School Board.
Administrators
Continuing members.
Teachers
H.S. & 3 Elem. teachers, spaced 3 year terms
Members
of the Visions Team for the 2006-2007 School year are as follows:
Brad
Madsen, Superintendent K-12
Keri
Bergeson, High School Principal 7-12
Val
Tuff, Elementary Principal PreK-6
Mary
Olson, Title I Coordinator
Sharon
Vick, MRVED Representative Elementary
(Minnesota
River Valley Education District), Grade 1
Carole
Femrite, Grade 1 Teacher
Catalina
Worden, MRVED Representative, High School
(Minnesota River Valley Education District), Spanish
Greg
Wyum, 7-12 Science Teacher
Phil
Lienemann, 7-12 English Teacher
Rhonda
Krosh,
Kendall
Stelter, School Board Member
Carol
Strand, Senior Citizen
Stephanie
Weber, Paraprofessional
Jeannette
Strand, Parent
Melanie
Knutson, 12th Grade Student
Amy
Banken, 12th Grade Student
Carol
Strand, Senior Citizen
Becky
Thoen, Grade 6 Teacher
Brandon
Moore, 7-12 Social Studies
Mary
Walsh Grade 4 Teacher
Method
of Selection
Community members, students,
and teachers are volunteers. The School Board appoints a representative yearly.
Administrators are continuous members.
Biennial
Evaluation of District Testing Program
Evaluation of the
district-testing program was held during 2006-2007. The group responsible for
evaluating the testing program was the Visions Team. In addition to statewide
testing, the school district continued the NWEA testing program. The team
examined and approved the testing procedures and results in the Annual Report on
Curriculum, Testing and Student Performance.
Across the year, testing methods and results were presented to the team.
The Visions Team has determined the testing program meets the needs of students
and satisfies the state graduation rule.
NWEA tests are given to
students in grades 2 through 10 in the fall of the year and grades 1 through 10
in the spring of the year. MCA II’s were given to students in grades 3 through
11 as required by the state of
The test results are used with
staff and the Visions to help guide curriculum and instruction. Provide
teachers, students, and parents with an accurate assessment of student progress
in mastering the basic skills. When administered at regular intervals over time
it is possible to find out whether an individual student or an entire grade
level is making satisfactory progress in these basic skills areas. Teachers can
use this assessment information for instructional planning for all individual
students or an entire class to improve curriculum and instruction.
Any student that does not pass
the basic skills testing has the opportunity to attend summer remediation
programs. They may then re-test in the summer or the following spring.
GRADUATION
REQUIREMENTS
Jr
Hi requirements:
Students
in grades 7&8 must make satisfactory academic progress in order to pass.
Students who fail 2 or more classes may be retained in that grade.
At the end of the third quarter 7th, 8th, and 9th
grade teachers will submit student names for consideration for retention of
grade. The student, their parents,
their teachers, and a building administrator will meet to determine if retention
is the best solution for meeting the students needs.
Reasons for retention could include lack of an adequate number of days of
attendance or instruction, low skill development, inadequate preparation for the
basic standards tests, or students demonstrating a lack of ownership in their
education process showing little responsibility and personal accountability.
Because
of changes made to graduation requirements and No Child Left Behind, the
Students
in grade 12 (Class of 2008) must earn a MINIMUM of 24 credits to graduate. Students
in grades 7-11 will need to meet the following credit and class requirements.
Dawson-Boyd will be
requiring 24 credits to graduate for the classes of 2008 (this years 12th
graders) and 2009 (this years 11th graders).
The classes of 2010 (grade 9 and beyond) will be required to earn 26
credits to earn a DBHS diploma.
Students will start
accumulating credits when they successfully pass classes during their 9th
grade year.
Under
NCLB, DBHS students will be required to accumulate the following credits at
Dawson-Boyd HS:
Students will start
accumulating credits when they successfully pass classes during their 9th
grade year.
·
Under NCLB, DBHS students will be
required to accumulate the following credits:
o
4 credits of English
o
3 credits of math, which encompass
algebra, geometry, probability, and statistics.
o
3 credits of science.
One of these credits must be in biology.
o
4 credits of social which include
at least one credit of US history, 1 credit of Geography, .5 credit of
Government and Citizenship, .5 credit of world history, and .5 credit of
economics.
o
1 credit of Health and 1 credit of
Physical Education
o
1 credit of art
o
All other credits are elective.
This is the current
transition plan, however, DBHS reserves the right to change the requirements as
needed to accommodate state/federal laws or school board action.
If there are changes to this current plan, students and parents will be
given ample notice to make sure that their son/daughter would have the
opportunity to successfully graduate.
TESTING:
Along with passing the required classes/credits as mentioned above,
students are also required to complete the following high stakes testing to earn
a diploma:
·
Current 11th and 12th
grade must successfully pass the 8th Grade Basic Standard Test for
·
The class of 2010 and beyond must
pass the following state tests in order to earn a DBHS diploma:
Grade 9 writing, Grade 10 reading; Grade 11 Math.
·
The state of
BST
Information
9th
Graders
Writing:
Passed:
43 of 45
Failed:
2 of 45
Pass
Exempt: 0
10th
Graders
Failed:
5 of 6
Pass
Exempt: 0
Math:
Passed:
0 of 4
Failed:
4 of 4
Pass
Exempt: 0
Written:
Passed:
45 of 46
Failed:
1 of 46
Pass
Exempt: 0
11th
Grade:
Failed:
0 re-took in 07
Pass
Exempt: 1
11th
Grade Math for BST continued:
Math:
Passed:
0 of 1
Failed:
1 of 1
Pass
Exempt: 1
Written:
Passed:
2 of 3
Failed:
1 of 3
Pass
Exempt: 0
Results
from Spring 2007 will be communicated to parents and the public after release.
Information may be obtained through the district office and will also be posted
on the
We
are including in this report the MCA test results from past years. This
information will provide base-line data for the
Level
I:
Student does not meet standards.
Level II :
Partially
meets standards.
Level IV:
Exceeds
standards.
MCA
results are based on students enrolled in the district by October 1st
of the fall prior to spring testing. MCA scoring has changed during the 2006-07
school year. The scoring has changed
from 5 levels to our current 4 level system listed above.
In the past, all grade level scale scores were based on a pass rate of
1420. The scoring system has changed
to the following format. The grade
level number is listed first followed by a two digit proficiency score.
Consider the following example: If a student is in third grade, a 3 would
be the first number of the score. The
next two digits will determine if the student is meeting or not meeting state
standards. Any score of 50-99 is
considered to meet standards. Any score from 0- 49 would not meet the standard.
Therefore a third grade student with a score of 351 would be meeting
grade level standards and a student with a score of 341 would not be meeting
grade level standards.
Mathematics 2007
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Percent of Students
3.4%
10.3% 62.1%
24.1%
Number of Students
1
3
18
7
Mean Scale Score:
358.6
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Percent of Students
11.1% 11.1%
25.9%
51.9%
Number of Students
3
3
7
14
Mean Scale Score:
361.5
Mathematics 2005
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
lV
Level V
Percent of Students
8%
13%
10%
58%
13%
Number of Students
3
5
4
23
5
Mean Scale Score:
1531.2
Achievement Level
Level 1 Level
II
Level IIl
Level IV
Level V
Percent of Students
8%
18%
8%
33%
35%
Number of Students
3
7
3
13
14
Mean Scale Score:
1576.8
Mathematics 2004
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Level V
Percent of Students
3%
17%
3%
59%
17%
Number of Students
1
5
1
17
5
Mean Scale Score:
1563.8
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
7%
14%
7%
41%
31%
Number of Students
2
5
2
12
9
Mean Scale Score:
1568.8
Mathematics 2003
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
lV
Level V
Percent of Students
3%
11%
21%
53%
13%
Number of Students
1
4
8
20
5
Mean Scale Score:
1547.3
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
8%
3%
18%
53%
18%
Number of Students
3
1
7
20
7
Mean Scale Score:
1537.0
Grade
Four MCA Results
Mathematics 2007
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Percent of Students
7.3%
17.1%
41.5%
34.1%
Number of Students
3
7
17
14
Mean Scale Score:
456.6
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Percent of Students
7.3%
19.5%
31.7%
41.5%
Number of Students
3
8
13
17
Mean Scale Score:
459
Grade
Five MCA Results
Mathematics 2007
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Percent of Students
12.8% 25.6%
43.6%
17.9%
Number of Students
5
10
17
7
Mean Scale Score:
551.5
Achievement Level
Level I Level
II
Level IIl
Level lV
Percent of Students
5.1%
12.8%
48.7%
33.3%
Number of Students
2
5
19
13
Mean Scale Score:
559.6
Mathematics 2005
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
3%
3%
8%
55%
28%
Number of Students
1
1
3
28
6
Mean Scale Score:
1582.0
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
5%
5%
3%
38%
50%
Number of Students
2
2
1
15
20
Mean Scale Score:
1636.4
Writing 2005
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Percent of Students
3%
10%
5%
55%
28%
Number of Students
1
4
2
22
11
Mathematics 2004
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
0%
15%
8%
58%
20%
Number of Students
0
6
3
23
8
Mean Scale Score:
1584.8
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
3%
10%
8%
48%
33%
Number of Students
1
4
3
19
13
Mean Scale Score:
1620.8
Writing 2004
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Percent of Students
3%
13%
5%
50%
30%
Number of Students
1
5
2
20
12
Mathematics 2003
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
0%
17%
17%
59%
7%
Number of Students
0
7
7
24
3
Mean Scale Score:
1547.9
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Level IIl Level
IV
Level V
Percent of Students
2%
7%
15%
49%
27%
Number of Students
1
3
6
20
11
Mean Scale Score:
1590.2
Writing 2003
Achievement Level
Level I
Level II
Percent of Students
5%
24%
5%
54%
12%
Number of Students 2 &